The Scientist : NewsBlog Print: Obama: Yes to stem cells, funding
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Obama: Yes to stem cells, funding
Posted by Bob Grant
[Entry posted at 2nd September 2008 04:10 PM GMT]

As controversy and rumors swirl around John McCain's newly-tapped running mate like tropical depression-force winds and the Republican National Convention sputters to a start, Barack Obama vowed to lift the ban on stem cell research and set targets to reduce carbon emissions, and promised to double basic research budgets over the next decade.

His promises are spelled out in responses to a science policy survey issued by research and science advocacy group ScienceDebate2008.

The Democratic presidential nominee provided lengthy answers to 14 questions on topics from climate change and national security to stem cell research and scientific integrity, voicing support for basic research and for confronting issues such as energy independence, combating global warming, and bolstering the economy through science and technology innovation.

According to ScienceDebate2008, McCain has indicated that he will also answer the 14 questions.

Here are some highlights from Obama's answers.

On basic research funding in light of Congress's likely spending constraints:

"As president, I will increase funding for basic research in physical and life sciences, mathematics, and engineering at a rate that would double basic research budgets over the next decade."

On balancing the benefits and potential risks genetic advances:

"I have been a long-time supporter of the recently passed Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act. In addition, concerned about the premature introduction of genetic testing into the public domain without appropriate oversight, I introduced the Genomics and Personalized Medicine Act of 2007 aimed at ensuring the safety and accuracy of such testing."

On climate change:

"First, the U.S. must get off the sidelines and take long-overdue action here at home to reduce our own greenhouse gas emissions. We must also take a leadership role in designing technologies that allow us to enjoy a growing, prosperous economy while reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050."

"Specifically, I will implement a market-based cap-and-trade system to reduce carbon emissions by the amount scientists say is necessary: 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. I will start reducing emissions immediately by establishing strong annual reduction targets with an intermediate goal of reducing emissions to 1990 levels by 2020."

On stem cell research:

"I strongly support expanding research on stem cells. I believe that the restrictions that President Bush has placed on funding of human embryonic stem cell research have handcuffed our scientists and hindered our ability to compete with other nations. As president, I will lift the current administration's ban on federal funding of research on embryonic stem cell lines created after August 9, 2001 through executive order, and I will ensure that all research on stem cells is conducted ethically and with rigorous oversight."

On balancing scientific information with politics and personal beliefs in decision-making:

"Scientific and technological information is of growing importance to a range of issues. I believe such information must be expert and uncolored by ideology.

I will restore the basic principle that government decisions should be based on the best-available, scientifically-valid evidence and not on the ideological predispositions of agency officials or political appointees."

 

Rate this article

Rating: 4.64/5 (36 votes )





Too Much Now at Stake
by Nelson Thompson

[Comment posted 2008-09-03 13:53:53]

People with an ideological bent against this or that scientific insight have always been around, whether it was evolution, the germ theory, transfusions or modern machinery. But never before in history have the stakes been so high. We are at risk of not merely losing thousands of lives, but of losing our Civilization. It is no longer appropriate for us to be ... "voting in the operating room on whether the heart has three or four chambers." Our executive leadership must be informed of the best science available, and religious or ideological obstructionism be damned.





Obama and McCain Responses to Similar Questions
by Marilyn Walker

[Comment posted 2008-09-02 15:22:46]

Research!America and our partners have also asked both candidates for their positions on health, science and research. While a slightly different focus than the Science Debate 2008 initiative, which we are supporting, it does add to the picture of the candidates' positions. Check out both presidential candidates' responses (and responses from Congressional candidates and a related public opinion poll to compare where Americans stand) at www.yourcandidatesyourhealth.com/presidential.php.





Comment on this blog